COMPARISON OF CARBON DIOXIDE EFFLUX IN DIFFERENT LAND USE TYPOLOGIES
Visualizações: 103DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v10i4.7149Keywords:
Microorganisms, Climate change, Agroecosystems, Sustainable productionAbstract
Management systems are crucial for soils functioning as a drain or source of greenhouse gas emissions. In this sense, among the alternatives for reducing the precursors of the greenhouse effect are integrated agricultural production systems, particularly Agroforestry Systems. These integrated systems maximize the use of biological cycles, soil, and animal waste, reducing agrochemicals and improving the condition of the rural populations involved. The present study aimed to evaluate the CO2 efflux in different land use types. The study was conducted in four agroecosystems: Forest (FO), Agroforestry Systems (AFS), Mandala (MD), and Degraded area (DA). To quantify the CO2 emanating from the soil, 10 mL of 0.5 N KOH aqueous solution is used and titrated using 0.1 N HCl, phenolphthalein, and 1% methyl orange as an indicator. The CO2 concentration from 5:00 am to 5:00 pm was lower. The lowest CO2 production occurred in FO (82.7 CO2 mg m-2 h-1), statistically differing from the other areas that obtained a CO2 rate higher than 140 mg m-2 h-1. As for kinetics, it was observed in all areas that the greatest release of CO2 during the day occurred at 7:00 am, and this release decreased as the soil temperature increased. The greatest release of CO2 and the highest temperatures occurred in DA, showing that these systems with anthropic modifications can be considered CO2 emitters however, systems closer to the natural ecosystem, such as the AFS, will store carbon in the soil, functioning as a carbon store. Therefore, to reduce CO2 emissions from agricultural activities, it is necessary to use systems that imitate natural ecosystems.
References
(I) Alves, A.R., Medeiros, A.N., Andrade, A.P., Frighetto, R.T.S., Silva, M.J.S., 2018. A caatinga e a oportunidade de mitigação das emissões de gases de efeito estufa pela atividade pastoril. Revista em Agronegócio e Meio Ambiente, 11(2), 639-661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2018v11n2p639-661
(II) Armstrong, R.D., Millar, G., Halpin, N.V.,Reid, D.J., Standley, J. 2003 Using zero tillage, fertilisers and legume rotations to maintain productivity and soil fertility in opportunity cropping systems on a shallow Vertosol. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 43(2), 141-153.
(III) Araújo, A.D., Souza, A.M., Santos, G.R., Andrade, P.A., Ferreira Neto, J.V.F. 2016. Atividade microbiana no solo em diferentes ambientes da região semiárida de Alagoas. Geografia, 25(2), 5-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/2447-1747.2016v25n2p5.
(IV) Besen, M.R., Ribeiro, R.H., Monteiro, A.N.T.R., Iasak, G.S., Piva, J.T. 2018. Práticas conservacionistas do solo e emissão de gases do efeito estufa no Brasil. Scientia Agropecuaria, 9(3), 429–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2018.03.15.
(V) Bartz, M.L.C., Brown, G.G., Rosa, M.G., Klauberg Filho, O., James, S.W., Decaëns, T., Baretta, D. 2014. Riqueza da minhoca nos sistemas de uso da terra em Santa Catarina, Brasil. Applied Soil Ecology, 83(2), 59-70.
(VI) Castellano, G.R., Moreno, L.X., Menegário, A.A., Govone, J.S., Gastmansa, D. 2017. Quantificação das emissões de CO2 pelo solo em áreas sob diferentes estádios de restauração no domínio da mata atlântica. Química Nova, 40(4), 407-412. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10. 21577/0100-4042.20170036.
(VII) Chaves, A.A.A., Lacerda, M.P.C., Goedert, W.J., Ramos, M.L.G., Kato, E. 2012. Indicadores de qualidade de Latossolo Vermelho sob diferentes usos. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 42(4), 446–454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-40632012000400002.
(VIII) Costa, M.I.S., Souza, T.E.M.S., Souza, E.R., Cunha, J.C., Leal, L.Y.C. 2017. Efluxo de CO2, atributos físicos e carbono do solo em manejos agroecológicos. Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 12(2), 251-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18378/rvads.v12i2.4163.
(IX) Denardin, L.G.O., Alves, L.A., Ortigara, C., Winck, B., Coblinski, J.A., Schmidt, M.R., Carlos, F.S., Toni, C.A.G., Camargo, F.A.O., Anghinoni, I., Clay, D. 2020. How different soil moisture levels affect the microbial activity of a lowland soil used by paddy Fields. Ciência Rural, 50(6), e20190831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14305017.
(X) Farhate, C.V.V., Souza, Z.M.; Oliveira, S.R.M., Tavares, R.L.M., Carvalho, J.L.N. 2018. Use of data mining techniques to classify soil CO2 emission induced by crop management in sugarcane Field. Plos one, 13(3), e0193537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193537.
(XI) Francisco, P.R.M., Medeiros, R.M., Santos, D. 2018. Balanço Hídrico Climatológico para a Capacidade de Campo de 100 mm – Estado da Paraíba. EDUFCG, Campina Grande.
(XII) Gomes, D.S., Barbosa, A.S., Santos, T.M.., Santos. S.K., Silva, J.H.C.S., Aquino, I.S. 2021. Cinética de liberação de CO2 e decomposição da fitomassa em sistemas de uso e manejo do solo. Research, Society and Development, 10(1), e9810111413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11413.
(XIII) Gomes, D.S., Santos, T.M., Barbosa, A.S., Santos, S.K.; Melo, T. S., Aquino, I.S. 2022. Edaphic breath in soil use and management systems. Journal of Environmental Analysis and Progress, 7(1), 9-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24221/jeap.7.01.2022.3641.009-015.
(XIV) Lazeris, T.S., Souza, J.P., Vezzani, F.M., Matos, C.L., Kaschk, G. 2021. Carbon and phosphorus biogeochemical cycles in native forest and horticultural areas in the metropolitan region of Curitiba, Brazil. Colloquium Agrariae, 17(3), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5747/ca.2021.v17.n3.a434.
(XV) Leal, Y.H., Souza, O.F.V., Dias, J.T.; Silva I.T., Leal, M.P.S., Souza, A.G., Lucena, F.R., Rodrigues, L.S., José. O. 2020. Smiderle edaphic respiration in bell pepper cultivation under biological fertilizers, doses and application times. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 32(6), 434-442. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.9755/ejfa.2020.v32.i6.2118.
(XVI) Lima, B.C., Araujo, F. 2018. Avaliação sobre a redução da atividade microbiana na adubação orgânica e sua influência no crescimento do milho e respiração do solo. Colloquium Agrariae, 14(3), 24-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5747/ca.2018.v14.n3.a224.
(XVII) López-Teloxa, L., Monterroso-Rivas, A. 2020. CO2 mitigation strategies based on soil respiration. La Granja: Revista de Ciencias de la Vida, 32(2), 30-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0881-4.
(XVIII) Montenegro, J. 2020. Efecto de diferentes fuentes de nitrógeno en la emisión de óxido nitroso en plantaciones de café en Costa Rica. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales, 54(2), 111-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17163/lgr.n32.2020.01.
(XIX) Mátyás, B., Lowy, A.D., Singla. A., Melendez, J.R., Sándor, Z. 2020. Comparison of effects exerted by bio-fertilizers, npk fertilizers, and cultivation methods on soil respiration in chernozem soil. La granja: Revista de Ciencias de la Vida, 32(2), 8-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17163/lgr.n32.2020.01.
(XX) Moura, J.A., Gonzaga, M.I.S., Anjos, J.L., Rodrigues, A.C.P., Leão, T.S., Santos, L.C.O. 2015. Respiração basal e relação de estratificação em solo cultivado com citros e tratado com resíduos orgânicos no estado de Sergipe. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 36(2), 731-746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/rca.54-2.6.
(XXI) Pezarico, C.R., Vitorino, A.C.T., Mercante, F.M., Daniel, O., 2013. Indicadores de qualidade do solo em sistemas agroflorestais. Revista de Ciências Agrárias, 56(1), 0-47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rca.2013.004.
(XXII) Primieri, S., Muniz A.W., Lisboa, M.H. 2017. Dinâmica do Carbono no Solo em ecossistemas nativos e plantações florestais em Santa Catarina. Floresta e Ambiente, 24(1), e00110314. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1590/2179-8087.110314.
(XXIII) Silva, M.A.G., Faria, G.G., Pereira, L.A., Tonetti, E.L., Santos, E. 2020. Ensaio de respiração edáfica para avaliar o efeito de temperatura e umidade do solo como variáveis climáticas na emissão de CO2 em espodossolo. Revista Brasileira de Climatologia, 27(1), 84–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/abclima.v%2525vi%2525i.73500.
(XXIV) Silva, J.H.C.S., Barbosa, A.S., Gomes, D.S., Araújo, M.B. 2022. Respiração basal edáfica em sistemas de uso e cobertura da terra em um Brejo de Altitude. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 43(4), 1849–1858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2022v43n4p1849.
(XXV). Simon, C.P., Vitória, E.L., Lacerda, E.G., Avancini, Y.S., Rodrigues, T.F., Simon, C.A. 2019. Emissão de CO2, atributos físicos e carbono orgânico total em diferentes sistemas de preparo do solo. Nativa, 7(5), 494-499. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v7i5.6273.
(XXVI) Valentini, C.M., Abreu, J.G.P.G., Faria, R.A. 2015. Respiração do solo como bioindicador em áreas degradadas. Revista Internacional de Ciências, 5(2), 127-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/ric.2015.19581.
(XXVII) Veeck, G.P., Teichrieb, C., Diaz, M., Bremm, T., Oliveira, M.E., Roberti, D., Amado, T.J., Fiorin, J.E., Bortolotto, R.P. 2018. Preliminary analysis of the relationship between soil and CO2 emissions from the ecosystem in an agroecosystem in southern Brazil. Ciência e Natura, 40(1), 251–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X3089.
(XXVIII) West, T.O, Post, W.M. 2002. Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66(6), 1930-1946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1930.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the rights to the manuscripts and, therefore, are free to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate the work under the following conditions:
Acknowledge work credits in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in a way that suggests that you have their support or that they support their use of their work).
REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL (ISSN 2358-6303) is under license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Sustainable Development Center of Bolsão Sul-Mato-grossense (CEDESU), of the University Unit of Cassilândia (UUC), preserves the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows their reuse under the license as mentioned above.
------------
The journal reserves the right to make normative, orthographic, and grammatical alterations in the originals, to maintain the cult standard of the language, respecting, however, the style of the authors.
Final proofs will be sent to the authors.
Published works become the property of the journal. The opinions expressed by the authors of the manuscripts are their sole responsibility.