EFFECTS OF THE PROPAGULE SIZE ON THE TUBEROUS RHIZOME PRODUCTION AND PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE

Visualizações: 803

Autores

  • Meiling Li Information Research Institute of Science and Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
  • Juan David Solano Mendoza Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus de Botucatu, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brasil.
  • Lin Chau Ming Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus de Botucatu, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v7i2.4231

Resumo

As a crop that is rich in oligosaccharides, Jerusalem artichoke is considered one of the most promising plants for production because of its ability to survive in marginal lands, strong resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, ease of conversion into biofuels, and use for food consumption. In the present study, the effects of propagule size on tuberous rhizome production and the physicochemical characteristics of Jerusalem artichoke were evaluated. Five propagule sizes of tuberous rhizome, 10 g (T1), 30 g (T2), 50 g (T3), 70 g (T4), and 90 g (T5), were used in a completely randomized experiment with 5 replicates and 11 plants per replicate. Harvesting was carried out 164 days after planting. The results showed that T1 resulted in the lowest emergence rate, number of tuberous rhizomes and aboveground fresh weight per plant of all the treatments. However, there was no significant difference among treatments in the tuberous rhizome dry weight, pH, titratable acidity, Brix, or reducing sugar. Propagule with tuberous rhizome of 30-50 g is recommended to achieve a high emergence rate and yield.

Referências

(I) Alla, N.A., Domokos-Szabolcsy, É., El-Ramady, H., Hodossi, S., Fári, M., Ragab, M., Taha, H., 2014. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.): A review of in vivo and in vitro propagation. International Journal of Horticultural Science, 20 (3-4), 131-136.

(II) Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.L., Sentelhas, P.C., Gonçalves, J.L.M., Sparovek, G., 2013. Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22(6), 711-728.

(III) AOAC. Association of official agricultural chemistry, 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. Washington, DC, 598 p.

(IV) Baillargé, E., 1942. Le topinambour. Flamnarion, Paris.

(V) Barloy, J., 1988. Identification Criteria for Jerusalem Artichoke Clones, in: Grassi, G., Gosse, G., (Eds). Topinambur (Jerusalem artichoke). Report No. EUR 11855 EN-FR-IT of the EEC; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p. 125-136.

(VI) Boswell, V.R., 1959. Growing the Jerusalem artichoke. USDA, Washington, DC (Leaflet No. 116).

(VII) Boswell, V.R., Steinbauer, C.E., Babb, M.F., Burlison, W.L., Alderman, W.H., Schoth, H.A., 1936. Studies of the culture and certain varieties of the Jerusalem artichoke. USDA, Washington, DC, p. 1-70 (Technical Bulletin No. 514).

(VIII) Brezeanu, P.M., Brezeanu, C., Ambarus S., Robu, T., 2016. Preliminary study on agronomic performance of Jerusalem artichoke species. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology, 20(3), 132-136.

(IX) Cecchi, H.M., 2003. Fundamentos teóricos e práticos em análise de alimentos, segunda ed. Campinas, Unicamp.

(X) Delbetz, P.T., 1867. Du Topinambour: Culture, Panification et Distillation de ce Tubercule. Libraire Centrale d’Agriculture et de Jardinage, Paris, 174 p.

(XI) Diederichsen, A., 2010. Phenotypic diversity of Jerusalem artichoke Helianthus tuberosus L. Gerrmplasm preserved by the Canadiam Genebank. Helia, 33(53), 1-16.

(XII) Filipović, V., Radanović, D., Marković, T., Ugrenović, V., Protić, R., Popović, V., Sikora, V., 2016. Productivity and tuber quality of Helianthus Tuberosus L. cultivated on different soil types in Serbia. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 21(4), 11695-11704.

(XIII) Goetz, P., 2011. Helianthus tuberosus - Topinambour. Phytothérapie, 9(2), 117-119.

(XIV) Instituto Adolfo Lutz, 1985. Normas analíticas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz: métodos químicos e físicos para análise de alimentos, terceira ed. IMESP, São Paulo.

(XV) Izsáki, Z., Kádi, G.N., 2013. Biomass accumulation and nutrient uptake of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 4(8), 1629-1640.

(XVI) Johansson, E., Prade, T., Angelidaki, I., Svensson, S.E., Newson, W.R., Gunnarsson, I.B., Hovmalm, H.P., 2015. Economically viable components from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L) in a biorefinery concept. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(4), 8997-9016.

(XVII) Kays, S.J., Nottingham, S.F., 2008. Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke: Helianthus tuberosus L. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton.

(XVIII) Kovac, V., Pekic, B., Berenji, J., 1983. Jerusalem artichoke as a potential raw material for the production of alcohol, in microbiological conversion of raw materials and by-products of agriculture into proteins, alcohol, and other products. Seminar Proceedings, Novi Sad, Yugoslavia, p. 35-51.

(XIX) Li, L., Zhong, Q.W., Ma, B.Y., Hou, Q., Li, J., 2005. Effect of propagation weight on yield of Jerusalem artichoke No.1. Qinghai Science and Technology, (6), 17-19.

(XX) Lloret, F., Casanovas, C., Penuelas, J., 1999. Seedling survival of Mediterranean shrubland species in relation to root: shoot ratio seed size and water and nitrogen use. Functional Ecology, 13(2), 210-216.

(XXI) Morrenhof, H., Bus, C.B., 1990. Aardper, een potentieel nieuw gewas-teeltonderzoek 1986-1989, in: Verslag No. 99, Research Station for Arable Farming and Field Production of Vegetables (PAGV), Lelystad, 66 p.

(XXII) Nelson, N.A., 1944. Photometria adaptation of Somogyi method for determination of glicose. Journal Biological Chemistry, 31(2), 159-161.

(XXIII) Raij, B., Andrade, J.C., Cantarella, H., Quaggio, J.A., 2001. Chemical analysis for fertility evaluation of tropical soils. IAC, Campinas.

(XXIV) Rakhimov, D.A., Zhauynbaeva, K.S., Mezhlumyan, L.G., Syrov, V.N., Khushbaktova, Z.A., Salikhov, S.A., Mavlyanova, R.F., 2011. Carbohydrate and protein components of Helianthus tuberosus and their biological activity. Chemistry of Natural Compounds, 47(4), 503-506.

(XXV) Razmkhah, M., Rezaei, J., Fazaeli, H., 2017. Use of Jerusalem artichoke tops silage to replace corn silage in sheep diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 228, 168-177.

(XXVI) Rocha, J.R., Catana, R., Ferreira, B.S., Cabral, J.M.S., Fernandes, P., 2006. Desing and characterization of an enzyme system for inulin hydrolysis. Food Chemistry, 95(1), 77-82.

(XXVII) Rossini, F., Provenzano, M.E., Kuzmanović, L., Ruggeri, R., 2019. Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.): a versatile and sustainable crop for renewable energy production in Europe. Agronomy, 9(9), 1-22.

(XXVIII) Seiwa, K., 2000. Effects of seed size and emergence time on tree seedling establishment: importance of developmental constraints. Oecologia, 123(2), 208-215.

(XXIX) Shen, S.F., Wu, L.H., Xiang, C., Li, B., 2019. Effects of seed size and pot culture on potato growth and yield in autumn. Seed, 38(6), 88-90.

(XXX) Slivertown, J.W., 1981. Seed size life span and germination date as co-adapted features of plant life history. American Naturalist, 118(6), 860-864.

(XXXI) Terzić, S., Atlagić, J., 2009. Nitrogen and sugar content variability in tubers of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Genetika, 41(3), 289-295.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-06-29

Como Citar

Li, M., Solano Mendoza, J. D., & Ming, L. C. (2020). EFFECTS OF THE PROPAGULE SIZE ON THE TUBEROUS RHIZOME PRODUCTION AND PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE. Revista De Agricultura Neotropical, 7(2), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v7i2.4231