AGRONOMIC EVALUATION AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF VEGETABLE SOYBEAN AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION

Authors

  • Laura Matos Ribera  Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-7714
  • Roberto Seiji Sakissaka Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Aquidauana, Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7826-2604
  • Mariana Dias Meneses Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-7483
  • Thatiane Nepomuceno Alves Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9077-9104
  • Maiele Leandro da Silva Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Aquidauana, Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7063-5138

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v13i1.9390

Keywords:

Glycine max L. Merrill, Green soybean, Poultry litter, Economic analysis

Abstract

Despite its growing popularity in Western diets, vegetable soybean remains relatively underexplored in terms of cultivar performance and management practices. This study aimed to evaluate the agronomic performance and economic efficiency of vegetable soybean cultivars in response to varying doses of poultry litter. The experiment was conducted in Aquidauana, MS, Brazil, utilizing a 2 x 4 factorial design that included two vegetable soybean cultivars (BRS 232 and BRS 267) and four poultry litter doses (6, 12, 18, and 24 t ha-1). The experimental setup followed a randomized block design with four replications. The following agronomic parameters were evaluated: plant height, first pod insertion height, 100-immature grain weight, green pod yield, total yield of immature grains, and number of pods per plant, as well as the following economic indices: gross income, net income, return rate, and profitability index. The cultivar BRS 232 demonstrated superior agronomic and economic performance, with agronomic optimum at 16.36 t ha-¹ and economic optimum at 6 t ha-¹. However, for the BRS 267 cultivar, it was not possible to establish predictive equations for most economic and agronomic indices, except for the first pod insertion height and the 100-grain weight. Consequently, poultry litter is a cost‑effective and profitable option for producers and adequately meets the nutritional requirements of vegetable soybeans.

Author Biographies

  • Laura Matos Ribera,  Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil

    Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil

  • Roberto Seiji Sakissaka, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Aquidauana, Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.

    Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Aquidauana, Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. 

  • Mariana Dias Meneses, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil.

    Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil

  • Thatiane Nepomuceno Alves, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil

    Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil

  • Maiele Leandro da Silva, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Aquidauana, Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.

    Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Aquidauana, Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.

References

(I) Alves, T.N., Cardoso, A.I.I., Nordi, N.T., Carvalho, J.A.R., Oliveira, M.M.V., Luis, D.C.M., Sousa, R.L., 2024. Organic fertilizer doses for top-dressing fertilization in jambu (*Acmella oleracea* [(L.) R. K. Jansen]) production. Comunicata Scientiae, 15 (e4070–e4070), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v15.4070

(II) Blair, R., Savin, M., Chen, P., 2014. Composted and formulated poultry litters promote soil nutrient availability but not plant uptake or edamame quality, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(4), 849–856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0206-9

(III) Cardoso, A.I.I., Oliveira, J.B., Lanna, N.B.L., Candian, J.S., Castro, J.L.M., 2020. Sources and splitting of the organic fertilization in top dressing in cabbage production. Horticultura Brasileira, 38, 230–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-053620200217

(IV) Charlo, H.C.O., Pessoa, R., Funichello, M., Castoldi, R., Braz, L.T., 2011. Desempenho agronômico de dez linhagens de soja-hortaliça. Horticultura Brasileira, 29, 349–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362011000300015

(V) Dhakal, K., Zhu, Q., Zhang, B., Li, M., Li, S., 2021. Analysis of Shoot Architecture Traits in Edamame Reveals Potential Strategies to Improve Harvest Efficiency. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.614926

(VI) Dhaliwal, D.S., Williams, M.M., 2020. Economically Optimal Plant Density for Machine-harvested Edamame. HortScience, 55 (3), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14642-19

(VII) Djanta, M.K.A., Agoyi, E.E., Agbahougba, S., Quenum, F.J.B., Chadare, F.J., Assogbadjo, A.E., Agbangla, C., Sinsin, B., 2020. Vegetable Soybean, Edamame: Research, Production, Utilization and Analysis of Its Adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 12(1), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JHF2019.0604

(VIII) Dong, D., Fu, X., Yuan, F., Chen, P., Zhu, S., Li, B., Yang, Q., Yu, X., Zhu, D., 2014. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Vegetable Soybean (Glycine Max (L.) Merr.) in China as Revealed by SSR Markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 61(1), 173–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-013-0024-y

(IX) Ferreira, D.F., 2014. Sisvar: A Guide for Its Bootstrap Procedures in Multiple Comparisons. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 38, 109–12.

(X) Fogelberg, F., Mårtensson, A.M., 2021. Aspects on Cultivation of Vegetable Soybean in Sweden – Cultivars, Soil Requirements, Inoculation and Nitrogen Contribution. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science, 71(7), 633–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2021.1945138

(XI) Guiducci, R.C.N., Alves, E.R.A., Lima Filho, J.R., Mota, M.M., 2012. Aspectos metodológicos da análise de viabilidade econômica de sistemas de produção. In: Guiducci, R.C.N., Alves, E.R.A., Lima Filho, J.R., Mota, M.M. (Eds.), Viabilidade econômica de sistemas de produção agropecuários: metodologia e estudos de caso. Embrapa, Brasília, DF, pp. 17–78.

(XII) Guo, J., Rahman, A., Mulvaney, M.J., Hossain, M.M., Basso, K., Fethiere, R., Babar, Md.A., 2020. Evaluation of Edamame Genotypes Suitable for Growing in Florida. Agronomy Journal, 112(2), 693–707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20136

(XIII) Jankauskienė, J., Brazaitytė, A., Vaštakaitė-Kairienė, V., 2021. Potential of Vegetable Soybean Cultivation in Lithuania. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 49(1), 12267–12267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha49112267

(XIV) Jiang, G.L., Rutto, L.K., Ren, S., 2018a. Evaluation of Soybean Lines for Edamame Yield Traits and Trait Genetic Correlation. HortScience, 53, 1732-1736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13448-18

(XV) Jiang, G.L., Rutto, L.K., Ren, S., Bowen, R.A., Berry, H., Epps, K., 2018b. Genetic Analysis of Edamame Seed Composition and Trait Relationships in Soybean Lines. Euphytica, 214(9), 158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2237-9

(XVI) Mozzoni, L., Chen, P., 2019. Correlations of yield and quality traits between immature and mature seed stages of edamame soybean. Journal of Crop Improvement, 33(1), 67–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2018.1542366

(XVII) Nair, R.M., Boddepalli, V.N., Yan, M.R., Kumar, V., Gill, B., Pan, R.S., Wang, C., Hartman, G.L., Souza, R.S., Somta, P., 2023. Global Status of Vegetable Soybean. Plants, 12(3), 609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030609

(XVIII) Nordi, N.T., Cardoso, A.I.I., Alves, T.N.A., Moraes, V.P.M., Carvalho, J.R., 2022. Adubação orgânica em cobertura na produção de jambu. Comunicata Scientiae, 13, e3827–e3827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v13.3827

(XIX) Oliveira, M.M.V., Alves, T.N., Cardoso, A.I.I., Luís, D.C.M., Carvalho, J.R., 2024. Production of Chives Using Organic Fertilizers before Planting and in Top Dressing. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 67, e24230542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2024230542

(XX) Pandini, F., Vello, N.A., Lopes, Â.C.A., 2002. Heterosis in Soybeans for Seed Yield Components and Associated Traits. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 45, 401–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132002000600001

(XXI) Ribera, L.M., Aires, E.S., Neves, C.S., Fernandes, G.C., Bonfim, F.P.G., Rockenbach, R.I., Rodrigues, J.D., Ono, E.O., 2022. Assessment of the Physiological Response and Productive Performance of Vegetable vs. Conventional Soybean Cultivars for Edamame Production. Agronomy, 12(6), 1478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061478

(XXII) Ribera, L.M., Cecílio Filho, A.B., Fernandes, G.C., Aires, E.S., Silva, M.L., Bonfim, F.P.G., 2024. From a Nutraceutical and Anti-Nutritional Perspective, Can a Grain Soybean Cultivar Be Used as Vegetable Soybean?. Ciência Rural, 54(12), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20230518

(XXIII) Schiavo, J.A., Pereira, M.G., Miranda, L.P.M., Dias Neto, A.H., Fontana, A., 2010. Caracterização e classificação de solos desenvolvidos de arenitos da formação Aquidauana-MS. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 34, 881–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832010000300029

(XXIV) Silva, F.C., Silva, F.C., 2009. Manual de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos.

(XXV) Tobar-Tosse, D.E., Castoldi, R., Candido, W.S., Ferraudo, A.S., Charlo, H.C.O., Braz, L.T., 2015. Caracterização de genótipos de soja-hortaliça por análise de componentes principais. Ciência Rural, 45, 1214–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20140597

(XXVI) Van der Merwe, R., Labuschagne, M.T., Smit, A., 2024. Cultivar variability and stability of vegetable-type soybean for seed yield and pod shattering. South African Journal of Botany, 166, 106–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2024.01.034

(XXVII) Yang, L., Song, W., Xu, C., Sapey, E., Jiang, D., Wu, C., 2023. Effects of High Night Temperature on Soybean Yield and Compositions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1065604

(XXVIII) Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Chin, K.L., Qi, Y., 2017. Vegetable Soybean: Seed Composition and Production Research. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 12(3), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2017.872

Downloads

Published

2026-10-07

How to Cite

AGRONOMIC EVALUATION AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF VEGETABLE SOYBEAN AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION. (2026). REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v13i1.9390