SENSITIVITY OF SOYBEAN CULTIVARS TO THE MIXTURE OF SULFENTRAZONE + DIURON APPLIED IN PRE-EMERGENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v12i3.9239

Keywords:

Photosystem II, Glycine max, Residual herbicides, Protox, Selectivity

Abstract

New herbicides for soybean cultivation, mainly mixtures, have been launched on the market. However, little is known about the actual effects of these mixtures on the crop, and studies are needed to verify the sensitivity of cultivars to these herbicides. This work aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of soybean cultivars to the commercial mixture of pre-emergent herbicides sulfentrazone + diuron. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse in a completely randomized design, with four replications, in a 20 x 3 factorial. Factor A was composed of 20 soybean cultivars. Factor B comprised two doses of sulfentrazone + diuron, being 175 + 350 g ha-1, and 350 + 700 g ha-1, equivalent to 1 and 2 L commercial product (cp) ha-1, in addition to a control treatment (zero dose). The variables evaluated were phytotoxicity, FSII activity, relative electron transport rate (rETR), shoot length, and shoot dry mass (SDM). The data were subjected to analysis of variance, and the means were grouped using the Skott-Knott test (p < 0.05). The mixture of sulfentrazone + diuron caused negative changes in the physiological and growth characteristics, especially at the highest dose evaluated. However, variability was observed in the sensitivity of the studied cultivars. HO Amambay, HO Iguaçu, HO Paraguaçu, HO Pirapó, Lança IPRO, Lótus IPRO, M6410 IPRO, TMG 2356 IPRO, TMG 2359 IPRO, and TMG 2364 IPRO cultivars were more sensitive. Therefore, it is concluded that the selectivity of the sulfentrazone + diuron mixture depends on the dose applied and the soybean cultivar.

Author Biographies

Edson Araújo de Amorim, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brasil.

José Flávio Firmani, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brasil.

Gustavo Henrique Gasque, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brasil.

Alexandre Chiang, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brasil.

Giliardi Dalazen, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brasil.

References

(I) AGROFIT. Sistema AGROFIT Brasil - Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento - MAPA. 2024. http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons (Accessed August 12, 2024).

(II) Baker, N.R. 2008. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59(1), 89-113. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759

(III) Beckie, H.J., Harker, K.N. 2017. Our top 10 herbicide-resistant weed management practices. Pest Management Science, 73(6), 1045-1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4543

(IV) Busi, R., Powles, S.B., Beckie, H.J., Renton, M. 2020. Rotations and mixtures of soil-applied herbicides delay resistance. Pest Management Science, 76(2), 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5534.

(V) CONAB. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. 2024. Safra - Série histórica dos grãos. https://portaldeinformacoes.conab.gov.br/safra-serie-historica-graos.html (Accessed November 16, 2024).

(VI) Dalazen, G., Kaspary, T.E., Markus, C., Pisoni, A., Merotto Jr, A. 2020. Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. Planta Daninha, 38, e020225717. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100081

(VII) Dayan, F.E., Weete, J.D., Duke, S.O., Hancock, H.G. 1997. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar differences in response to sulfentrazone. Weed Science, 45(5), 634-641. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500093255

(VIII) Ferreira, E.A., Santos, J.B., Silva, A.A., Ventrella, M.C., Barbosa, M.H.P., Procópio, S.O., Rebello, V.P.A. 2005. Sensibilidade de cultivares de cana-de-açúcar à mistura trifloxysulfuron-sodium + ametryn. Planta Daninha, 23(1), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582005000100012

(IX) Frans, R., Talbert, R., Marx, D., Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. In: Camper, N. D. (Ed.) Research methods in weed science. 3. ed. Southern Weed Science Society, Champaign, p. 29-46.

(X) Galon, L., Maciel, C.D.G., Agostinetto, D., Concenço, G., Moraes, P. 2011. Seletividade de herbicidas às culturas pelo uso de protetores químicos. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 10(3), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v10i3.167

(XI) Gazola, T., Dias, M.F., Belapart, D., Castro, E.B., Bianchi, L. 2016. Efeitos do diclosulam na soja cultivada em solos de diferentes classes texturais. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 4(3), 353-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v15i4.483

(XII) Gehrke, V.R., Camargo, E.R., Avila, L.A. 2020. Sulfentrazone: dinâmica ambiental e seletividade. Planta Daninha, 38, e020215663. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100032

(XIII) Heap, I., Duke, S.O. 2018. Overview of glyphosate‐resistant weeds worldwide. Pest Management Science, 74(5), 1040-1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4760

(XIV) Heap, I. 2025. International survey of herbicide resistance. http://www.weedscience.org/Home.aspx (Accessed April 25, 2025).

(XV) Hess, F.D. 2000. Light-dependent herbicides: an overview. Weed Science, 48(2), 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0160:LDHAO]2.0.CO;2

(XVI) López-Ovejero, R.F., Soares, D.J., Oliveira, N.C., Kawaguchi, I.T., Berger, G.U., Carvalho, S.J.P. 2016. Interferência e controle de milho voluntário tolerante ao glifosato na cultura da soja. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 51(4), 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016000400006

(XVII) Maxwell, K., Johnson, G. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51(345), 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659

(XVIII) Menendez, J., Prado, R. 1997. Detoxification of chlorotoluron in a chlorotoluron-resistant biotype of Alopecurus myosuroides. Comparison between cell cultures and whole plants. Plant Physiology, 99(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03436.x

(XIX) Mueller, C.T., Boswell, B.W., Mueller, S.S., Steckel, L.E. 2014. Dissipation of fomesafen, saflufenacil, sulfentrazone, and flumioxazin from a tennessee soil under field conditions. Weed Science, 62(4), 664-671. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00183.1

(XX) Neto, M.E.F., Pitelli, R.A., Basile, E., Timossi, P.C. 2009. Seletividade de herbicidas pós-emergentes aplicados na soja geneticamente modificada. Planta Daninha, 27(2), 345-352. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582009000200018

(XXI) Osipe, J.B., Oliveira Junior, R.S., Constantin, J., Biffe, D.F., Rios, F.A., Franchini, L.H.M., Gheno, E.A., Raimondi, M.A. 2014. Seletividade de aplicações combinadas de herbicidas em pré e pós-emergência para a soja tolerante ao glyphosate. Bioscience Journal, 30(3), 623-631. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v30n3a2014-18042

(XXII) Preisler, A.C., Pereira, A.E., Campos, E.V., Dalazen, G., Fraceto, L.F., Oliveira, H.C. 2020. Atrazine nanoencapsulation improves pre-emergence herbicidal activity against Bidens pilosa without enhancing long-term residual effect on Glycine max. Pest Management Science, 76(1), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5482

(XXIII) Reiling, K.L., Simmons, F.W., Riechers, D.E., Steckel, L.E. 2006. Application timing and soil factors affect sulfentrazone phytotoxicity to two soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cultivars. Crop Protection, 25(3), 230-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.11.004

(XXIV) Shaner, D.L. 2014. Herbicide handbook. 10th ed. Lawrence: Weed Science Society of America. 513 p.

(XXV) Silva, A.A., Ferreira, F.A., Ferreira, L.R. 2009. Herbicidas: classificação e mecanismos de ação, p. 83-148, In: Silva, A. A., Silva, J. S. (Eds.). Tópicos em manejo de plantas daninhas. Viçosa: UFV, 367 p.

(XXVI) Song, N.H., Yin, X.L., Chen, G.F., Yang, H. 2007. Biological responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants to the herbicide chlorotoluron in soils. Chemosphere, 68(9), 1779-1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.023

(XXVII) Tripathy, B.C., Mohapatra, A., Gupta, I. 2007. Impairment of the photosynthetic apparatus by oxidative stress induced by photosensitization reaction of protoporphyrin IX. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) Bioenergetics, 1767(6), 860-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.03.008

(XXVIII) Velini, E.D., Martins, D., Manoel, L.A., Matsuoka, S., Travain, J.C., Carvalho, J.C. 2000. Avaliação da seletividade da mistura de oxyfluorfen e ametryne, aplicada em pré ou pós-emergência, a dez variedades de cana-de-açúcar (cana-planta). Planta Daninha, 18(1), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582000000100012

(XXIX) Vitorino, H.D.S., Silva Junior, A.C.D., Gonçalves, C.G., Martins, D. 2017. Interferência de plantas daninhas na cultura da soja em função do espaçamento de semeadura. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 48(4), 605-613. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20170070.

(XXX) Zacharias, W.L.F., Pierro, P.H.C., Oliveira, G.M.P., Bovo, R.F., Zarelli, L.G., Dalazen, G. 2021. Weed control and soybean agronomic performance in response to application of sulfentrazone + diuron in pre-emergence. Colloquium Agrariae, 17(3), 70-82. https://journal.unoeste.br/index.php/ca/article/view/3886/3272

Downloads

Published

2025-09-15

How to Cite

Araújo de Amorim, E., Firmani, J. F., Gasque, G. H., Chiang, A., & Dalazen, G. (2025). SENSITIVITY OF SOYBEAN CULTIVARS TO THE MIXTURE OF SULFENTRAZONE + DIURON APPLIED IN PRE-EMERGENCE. REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v12i3.9239