EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIES
Visualizações: 211DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v10i2.7235Keywords:
Acidification, Broiler production, Chicken litter, Poultry house managementAbstract
Acidification of animal manure has been one of the approaches used to combat the proliferation of bacteria and high volatilization of ammonia (NH3). Conversely, alkalinization is performed with basic oxides in Brazil, which raises the pH of the litter and soil from floors of chicken facility, creating a constant source of contamination in them. In this context, this study was undertaken to examine the effect of sodium bisulfate (SB) and elemental sulfur (ES) on the acidification of different soils from floor of chicken housing facilities, considering their efficiency and reaction time. The experiment involved tree soils collected inside chicken facilities (at six, 36, and 60 months of occupation), as well as soil that was collected outside the facilities, totaling four sampling sites. Both acidifier sources—SB and ES—were applied at six increasing doses (0, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 cmolc kg-1 of H+ in the 3-cm soil layer), and incubated for up to 53 days. At the end of each incubation period, the pH of the soil was measured. The results suggest that SB is efficient in reducing the pH of chicken soil, with an immediate reaction occurring after its application. Under the conditions adopted in the present study, the recommended dose of SB to reduce the pH to 5.0 was 6 cmolc kg-1 of H+, which corresponded to the application of 7.2 g of the product in 500 g of soil. Elemental sulfur showed a slow reaction and low efficiency. The use of SB quickly and efficiently provides the acidification of soil from floor of chicken housing facilities.
References
(I) Aniecevski, E., Galli, G.M., Pagnussatt, H., Valentini, F.D.A., Leite, F., Dal Santo, A., Petrolli, T.G. 2022. Avaliação da utilização ácidos orgânicos sobre a qualidade físico-química e microbiológica da cama de aviário. Research, Society and Development, 11(3), e31111326501. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26501
(II) Ávila, V.S., Mazzuco, H., Figueiredo, E.A.P. 1992. Cama de aviário: materiais, reutilização, uso como alimento e fertilizante. Embrapa Suínos e Aves, Concordia/SC (Circular Técnica, 16) 38p.
(III) Boaro, V., Schwarz, S.F., Souza, P.V.D.D., Soares, W., Lourosa, G.V. 2014. Enxofre elementar no manejo do pH de substrato orgânico alcalino. Ciência Rural, 44(12), 2111-2117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20130768
(IV) CIAS. CENTRAL DE INTELIGÊNCIA DE AVES E SUÍNOS, 2021. Estatísticas. https://www.embrapa.br/suinos-e-aves/cias/estatisticas (acessado 13 de julho de 2021).
(V) De Angelo, J.C., Gonzales, E., Kondo, N., Anzai, N.H., Cabral, M.M. 1997. Material de cama: qualidade, quantidade e efeito sobre o desempenho de frangos de corte. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 26(1), 121-130.
(VI) Gonçalves, N.S., Komiyama, C.M., Lima, J.F.P., Moraes, M.D.G., Savegnago, F.B., Mezzalira Júnior, C., Rosa, C.C.B., Staub, L. 2019. Qualidade da cama de frango de corte e a alternativa da acidificação como tratamento. Nativa, 7(6), 828-834. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31413/nativa. v7i6.7041
(VII) IBGE. INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. 2022. Estatística da produção pecuária, jan-mar. 2022. 52p. https://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Producao_Pecuaria/Fasciculo_Indicadores_IBGE/abate-leite-couroovos_202201caderno.pdf (acessado 13 de julho de 2021).
(VIII) Line, J.E. 2002. Campylobacter and Salmonella populations associated with chickens raised on acidified litter. Poultry Science, 81(10), 1473-1477. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.10.1473.
(IX) Line, J.E., Bailey, J.S., 2006. Effect of on-farm litter acidification treatments on Campylobacter and Salmonella populations in commercial broiler houses in northeast Georgia. Poultry Science, 85(9), 1529-1534. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.9.1529
(X) McWard, G.W., Taylor, D.R., 2000. Acidified clay litter amendment. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 9(4), 518-529.
(XI) Nagaraj, M., Wilson, C.A.P., Saenmahayak, B., Hess, J.B., Bilgili, S.F. 2007. Efficacy of a litter amendment to reduce pododermatitis in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 16(2), 255-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/16.2.255
(XII) Novais, R.F., Alvarez V., V.H., Barros, N.F., Fontes, R.L.F., Cantarutti, R.B., Neves, J.C.L. 2007. Fertilidade do solo. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa.
(XIII) Oliveira, M.C., Godoi, C.R., 2010. Tratamento da cama de frango sobre o desempenho das aves e qualidade da carcaça e da cama. PUBVET, Londrina.
(XIV) Orman, S., Kaplan, M. 2011. Effects of elemental sulfur and farmyard manure on pH and salinity of calcareous sandy loam soil and some nutrient elements in tomato plant. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 5 (1), 20-26.
(XV) Oro, C., Guirro, E.C.B.D.P. 2014. Influência da amônia proveniente da cama aviária sobre o bem-estar de frangos de corte. Revista Veterinária em Foco, 12(1), 49-63.
(XVI) Pope, M.J., Cherry, T.E. 2000. An evaluation of the presence of pathogens on broilers raised on poultry litter treatment-treated litter. Poultry Science, 79(9), 1351-1355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.9.1351.
(XVII) Raij, B. van; Andrade, J.C.; Cantarella, H.; Quaggio, J.A., 2001. Análise química para avaliação da fertilidade de solos tropicais. Instituto Agronômico, Campinas.
(XVIII) Reck, A.B., Schultz, G. 2016. Aplicação da metodologia multicritério de apoio à decisão no relacionamento interorganizacional na cadeia da avicultura de corte. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 54(4), 709-728. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-94790540407.
(XIX) Santos, M.J.B., Samay, A.M.A.T., Silva, D.A.T., Rabello, C.B., Torres, T.R., Santos, P.A., Camelo, L.C.L. 2012. Manejo e tratamento de cama durante a criação de aves. Revista Eletrônica Nutritime, 9(3), 1801-1815.
(XX) Sierra, C., Lancelloti, A., Vidal, I., 2007. Azufre Elemental como Corrector del pH y la Fertilidad de Alfunos Suelos de la III y IV Región de Chile. Agricultura Técnica, 67(2), 173-181. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0365-28072007000200007.
(XXI) Silva, V.S. 2011. Métodos e Segurança Sanitária na Reutilização de Cama de Aviário. EMBRAPA Suínos e Aves. https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/920825/1/metodosesegurancasanitaria.pdf (acessado 28 de setembro de 2022).
(XXII) Terzich, M., Quarles, C., Goodwin, M.A., Brown, J. 1998. Effect of Poultry Litter Treatment®(PLT®) on death due to ascites in broilers. Avian Diseases, 42(2), 385-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1592490
(XXIII) Vaz, C. 2022. Manejo da cama de frango. In: CONFERÊNCIA FACTA. Anais: avicultura, o futuro é agora. FACTA, Campinas https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/1143623/1/final9917.pdf (acessado 28 de setembro de 2022).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the rights to the manuscripts and, therefore, are free to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate the work under the following conditions:
Acknowledge work credits in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in a way that suggests that you have their support or that they support their use of their work).
REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL (ISSN 2358-6303) is under license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Sustainable Development Center of Bolsão Sul-Mato-grossense (CEDESU), of the University Unit of Cassilândia (UUC), preserves the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows their reuse under the license as mentioned above.
------------
The journal reserves the right to make normative, orthographic, and grammatical alterations in the originals, to maintain the cult standard of the language, respecting, however, the style of the authors.
Final proofs will be sent to the authors.
Published works become the property of the journal. The opinions expressed by the authors of the manuscripts are their sole responsibility.