Trabalhos de amor perdidos, trabalhos de crítica e teoria encontrados

um romance-tese?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61389/revell.v2i40.9518

Keywords:

theoretical-critical (meta)fiction, contemporary Brazilian literature, Jorge Furtado, William Shakespeare

Abstract

This article analyzes Trabalhos de amor perdidos (2006), a novel by Jorge Furtado that parodies Shakespeare’s homonymous comedy, focusing on the interplay between fictional, theoretical, and critical discourses, as well as its didactic potential in engaging with William Shakespeare and his oeuvre. Drawing on the notion of theoretical-critical (meta)fiction, the discussion explores how the text employs strategies typically associated with academic writing – such as footnotes, bibliography, and analytical reflections – alongside literary techniques that offer a renewed interpretation of Shakespeare. It argues that this intertwining of theoretical-critical discourses and didactic impulses broadens the scope of fiction, proposing new pathways for literary literacy among contemporary Brazilian readers. Thus, Trabalhos de amor perdidos foregrounds the hybrid nature of literary creation, theory, and criticism, establishing itself as a “critical-theoretical-fictional labour of love” that generates new interpretive possibilities. Ultimately, although it is not an academic thesis in the strict sense, the novel challenges conventional boundaries between art and academia, presenting a hybrid literary form that merges fiction and critical reflection.

Author Biography

  • Caio Antônio Nóbrega, Instituto Federal da Paraíba (IFPB)

    Caio Antônio Nóbrega é doutor em Letras pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB). Atua como professor de língua inglesa e de teoria literária no Instituto Federal da Paraíba (IFPB). ORCID id: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4614-5769. E-mail: caio.nobrega@ifpb.edu.br.

References

BERNARDO, Gustavo. O livro da metaficção. Rio de Janeiro: Tinta Negra, 2010.

BLOOM, Harold. Shakespeare: a invenção do humano. Trad. José Roberto O’Shea. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2000.

BRAMS, Annemie; INGELBIEN, Raphaël. “I loved my books”: Shakespeare and the modernity of loving literature. Shakespeare, v. 14, n. 4, p. 326-340, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2017.1291535

CLARK, Jonathan Russell. On the fine art of the footnote: from Nabokov to Danielewski, beyond the experimental. Literary Hub, 2015. Disponível em: https://lithub.com/the-fine-art-of-the-footnote/. Acesso em: 07 abril 2025.

FURTADO, Jorge. Trabalhos de amor perdidos. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2006.

FUX, Jacques; MOREIRA, Maria Elisa Rodrigues. Fronteiras, deslocamentos, fluxos: quando a ficção questiona o estatuto da ficção. Remate de males, Campinas, v. 28, n. 2, p. 197-210, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/remate.v28i2.8636301

GREANEY, Michael. Contemporary fiction and the uses of theory: the novel from structuralism to postmodernism. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230208070

HELIODORA, Barbara. Shakespeare: o que as peças contam. Rio de Janeiro: Edições de Janeiro, 2014.

LODGE, David. The novel now: theories and practices. NOVEL: a forum of fiction, v. 21, n. 2, p. 125-138, 1988.

NÓBREGA, Caio Antônio; AZERÊDO, Genilda. Um sonho teórico-crítico de (meta)ficção: ou “como compreender essa doideira?”. Revista Brasileira de Literatura Comparada, Salvador, v. 26, p. 1-18, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2596-304x202426e20240939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2596-304x202426e20240939

SEIGWORTH, Gregory J.; GREGG, Melissa. An inventory of shimmers. In: SEIGWORTH, Gregory J.; GREGG, Melissa (Orgs.). The affect theory reader. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2010, p. 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393047

WAUGH, Patricia. Metafiction: the theory and practice of self-conscious fiction. London and New York: Routledge, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1771928

Published

2026-03-10

How to Cite

Trabalhos de amor perdidos, trabalhos de crítica e teoria encontrados: um romance-tese?. REVELL - UEMS JOURNAL OF LITERARY STUDIES, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 40, p. 211–223, 2026. DOI: 10.61389/revell.v2i40.9518. Disponível em: https://periodicosonline.uems.br/REV/article/view/9518. Acesso em: 14 apr. 2026.